next up previous contents
Next: Miscellaneous Near-Infrared Data Up: Users Manual for the Previous: VMS/UNIX Equivalents

System Performance

 

The best empirical estimate of the system performance is the observation that for imaging with 0.5'' pixels after 6 hr of on-source integration, objects spread over tex2html_wrap_inline6967 with tex2html_wrap_inline6969 19.5 mag are detectable with a signal-to-noise ratio of tex2html_wrap_inline6194 5, depending on how they are measured. This is confirmed by similar observations with 4 min on-source integration times reaching tex2html_wrap_inline6969 17.0 mag with similar signal-to-noise ratio.

The following describes measurements of basic system parameters, and then calculations of the theoretical performance based on these parameters. These calculations can be used to estimate system performance in other configurations, but should be normalized by comparison with the above observed sensitivities.

System zero point offsets are based on the total ADUs in a sky-subtracted stellar image after correction for airmass effects and are defined by the equation tex2html_wrap_inline6975 . Typical values of the zero point offsets for each filter (mainly with the 0.5'' pixel scale) are listed in Table 5. These can be used to calculate the total signal expected on an object of a given brightness or the signal/pixel on an object of a given surface brightness.

   table1744
Table 5: Typical Zero Points

Typical background brightnesses measured with CASPIR are listed in Table 6. The expected background photon fluxes can be calculated from the tabulated background brightnesses and the system zero point offsets.

   table1756
Table 6: Background Brightnesses (mag/arcsec tex2html_wrap_inline6196 )

The noise in an image is a combination of photon shot noise from the sky and telescope, photon shot noise from the object, shot noise from the dark current, read noise, and other systematic noise sources that are difficult to quantify. For small signals, the noise per pixel can be estimated from the equation

displaymath6949

where RN is the read noise in e tex2html_wrap_inline6353 , T is the integration time in sec, tex2html_wrap_inline7037 is the background signal in e tex2html_wrap_inline6353 /sec, and tex2html_wrap_inline7041 is the dark current in e tex2html_wrap_inline6353 /sec. The read noise for the double sample readout methods (methods 2-4, and method 5 with FNDR=1) is tex2html_wrap_inline6194 60 e tex2html_wrap_inline6353 . The dark current is typically < 30 e tex2html_wrap_inline6353 /s/pixel for most of the array, but there are a significant number of detectors with dark currents of > 50 e tex2html_wrap_inline6353 /s/pixel (see Fig. 3).

With these data, theoretical performance  figures for CASPIR can be calculated from the measured background brightness and the camera throughput as quantified by the system zero point.

For example, for a Kn background brightness of 12.4 mag/arcsec tex2html_wrap_inline6196 and a Kn zero point offset of 20.5 mag, the Kn background flux for 0.5'' pixels is

displaymath6950

In a 5 sec integration, the background count is tex2html_wrap_inline6194 2170 ADU/pixel, or 19550 e tex2html_wrap_inline6353 /pixel (1 ADU = 9 e tex2html_wrap_inline6353 ). The shot noise of this background signal is tex2html_wrap_inline7073 which dominates the typical readout noise of 60 e tex2html_wrap_inline6353 . Consequently, Kn images with 0.5'' pixels and an integration time of 5 sec should be background limited. The total noise per cycle is tex2html_wrap_inline7081 e tex2html_wrap_inline6353 /pixel or 152/9 = 16.9 ADU/pixel which is reduced to 4.9 ADU/pixel when 12 cycles are averaged. The measured value is tex2html_wrap_inline6194 5 ADU/pixel. We assume here that sufficient sky frames are averaged so that sky subtraction is essentially noiseless.

For a 5 tex2html_wrap_inline7089 detection of an object spread over tex2html_wrap_inline7091 pixels, we require an average signal in each of these tex2html_wrap_inline7093 pixels of five times the noise per pixel. The total object signal is then tex2html_wrap_inline7095 ADU. This can be converted to a Kn magnitude after dividing by the integration time of 5 sec and using the Kn zero point offset of 20.5 mag. In this way, we can estimate limiting magnitudes at Kn for a range of seeing or object sizes. The results of these calculations are shown in detail in Table 7.

   table1994
Table 7: Performance Predictions at Kn (0.5''/pixel)

Predicted performance figures for 5 tex2html_wrap_inline7089 detections in 1 min of on-source integration in different seeing conditions for various filters are listed in Table 8 for the 0.5''/pixel scale and in Table 9 for the 0.25''/pixel scale. The 1 min integration time does not include time for sky measurements and the dead time between frames of tex2html_wrap_inline6194 20 sec. It is recommended to limit individual frames to 1 min exposures, effectively making the elapsed time tex2html_wrap_inline6194 80 sec, so that an adequate number of sky frames can be obtained in the timescale of tex2html_wrap_inline6194 15 min on which the sky level is observed to change significantly. If off-source sky measurements are necessary, it is recommended that equal time be spent on the object and sky positions.

   table2031
Table 8: Predicted System Performance (0.5''/pixel)

   table2090
Table 9: Predicted System Performance (0.25''/pixel)

Relative performance figures for each filter are of interest in deciding which passband is most sensitive for a particular observation. These calculations for the 0.5''/pixel scale in 1.5'' seeing and an integration time of 5 sec with 12 cycles are listed in Table 10 for a 15.0 mag star with zero color (S/N tex2html_wrap_inline7215 ), a typical unreddened late-type star with K = 15.0 mag, J-K = 1.0, and H-K = 0.2 (S/N tex2html_wrap_inline7223 ), and a typical AGN power law spectrum with tex2html_wrap_inline7225 and K = 15.0 mag (S/N tex2html_wrap_inline7229 ).

   table2155
Table 10: Relative Performances for Different Objects With K = 15 mag

Performance figures for the grisms can be estimated assuming a slit transmission tex2html_wrap_inline7247 and grism transmissions, tex2html_wrap_inline7249 , as shown in Tables 11 & 12. For example, consider an observation using the HK grism and a 1'' (2 pixel) wide slit of an object spread over 2'' ( tex2html_wrap_inline7255 pixels) along the slit and recorded in two frames ( tex2html_wrap_inline7257 ) each with an integration time T = 180 sec and with the object placed at different positions along the slit in both images. The spectral resolution at 2.2 tex2html_wrap_inline6254 m is 2.2/2200 = 0.001 tex2html_wrap_inline6254 m/pixel, or a factor of tex2html_wrap_inline7265 lower than for Kn. In the spectral direction, each pixel sees signal from an area of sky tex2html_wrap_inline7269 = 0.5 arcsec tex2html_wrap_inline6196 , dispersed by a factor of tex2html_wrap_inline7273 more than for Kn, but reduced in flux by tex2html_wrap_inline7249 . The background current per pixel (averaged over features in the sky emission spectrum) is therefore

displaymath6951

Here we have used the observed Kn background brightness, tex2html_wrap_inline7281 , of 12.4 mag/arcsec tex2html_wrap_inline6196 , and zero point offset, Z.P., of 20.5 mag, and conversion between electrons and ADU, Gain, of 9 e tex2html_wrap_inline6353 /ADU. The noise per pixel is then

displaymath6952

where we use a read noise of 60 e tex2html_wrap_inline6353 and an average long-integration dark current of tex2html_wrap_inline6194 10 e tex2html_wrap_inline6353 /s/pixel (see Fig. 3). We see from this that shot noise from the dark current makes a dominant contribution to the total noise, and that integration times of order 180 sec are required to minimise the read noise contribution. Integration times significantly longer than this are not recommended because sky intensity variations make accurate sky subtraction increasingly difficult, and significant numbers of hot pixels saturate as the integration time is increased further. Normally, spectra are recorded as a nodded pair to allow sky subtraction, and preferably as an ABBA sequence. In the case where a single sky frame is subtracted from an object frame to perform the sky subtraction, the total noise per pixel is increased by tex2html_wrap_inline7297 because the sky frame has the same noise per pixel as the object frame. For our example, the final noise becomes 123 e tex2html_wrap_inline6353 /pixel.

We define a 5 tex2html_wrap_inline7089 detection per pixel by requiring a signal-to-noise ratio of 5 per pixel after averaging tex2html_wrap_inline7303 pixels along the slit and averaging the tex2html_wrap_inline7305 object frames. The average object signal per pixel in the dispersion direction is then

displaymath6953

The equivalent Kn imaging signal rate would be

displaymath6954

which corresponds to a Kn brightness of

displaymath6955

From this we predict that a signal-to-noise ratio of 50:1 can be achieved with the HK grism on a Kn = 8.1 mag object in the continuum in 6 min of on-source integration. Similar calculations for each of the grisms are presented in Tables 11 & 12. Note that integrations with the K grism are limited to 120 sec duration by the background flux at 2.4 tex2html_wrap_inline6254 m.

The 5 tex2html_wrap_inline7089 line detection sensitivity in the same time can be estimated by assuming the line occupies two pixels in the dispersion direction. The line flux is then tex2html_wrap_inline7319 W cm tex2html_wrap_inline6925 .

   table2211
Table 11: Predicted Long-Slit Grism Performance

   table2285
Table 12: Predicted Cross-Dispersed Grism Performance

The signal-to-noise ratio achived with the HK grism has been determined empirically to be given by

displaymath6956

This reproduces the predicted HK grism sensitivity in Table 12.


next up previous contents
Next: Miscellaneous Near-Infrared Data Up: Users Manual for the Previous: VMS/UNIX Equivalents

Kabal
Thu Jun 5 16:44:21 EST 1997