 |
Canberra
Astronomical Society
|
Southern Cross - Sep 2003
|
COTM:
Corona Australis
Ross Gould
Corona Australis is tucked into a little
corner of the sky beside Scorpius, with Sagittarius adjacent.
The little circlet of its brighter stars is readily noticed.
The Milky Way runs through it, so objects for observing are
those from our galaxy, with other galaxies greatly obscured.
It contains a fine globular Cluster, NGC 6541, the interesting
nebular region NGC 6726-7-9, and a number of good double stars.
Descriptions below are with a 7” refractor except when
otherwise indicated.
Clusters
NGC 6541 (18 08.1, -43 43). A beautiful field
that includes the fine bright partly resolved globular cluster
NGC 6541. My old 6-inch Newtonian showed some resolution into
stars, and the 7” refractor shows more. The double star
HJ5014 is NW of the cluster, and can be included in the same
low power field.
NGC 6496 is a small globular, rather faint
and without resolution in the 7”. It is on the border
with Scorpius. Those who like globulars will prefer 6541; those
who like faint fuzzies will enjoy finding this one.
Nebulae
NGC 6726-7-9 (1901.7,-3653). The position is
for the double nebula 6726-7. On the northern border of CrA
is this region of several nebulous spots. A bonus in the field,
as the DSS image shows, is the globular cluster NGC 6723 nearby
(across the Sagittarius border).
NGC 6729 is a variable, comet-like nebula,
similar to Hubble’s nebula NGC 2261 in
Monoceros. Each has an embedded variable star. This is an interesting
field both visually and for imaging.
IC 1297 (1917.4, -3937). I haven’t seen
this small but moderately bright planetary nebula, which Hartung
says is visible with 15cm.
Double Stars
Despite being in the Milky Way, CrA isn’t over-supplied
with bright pairs. However some of these are fine objects. The
best of them is probably Gamma CrA (19064-3704).
This is a 120 year binary, which has been in the closer part
of its orbit in recent years. At present it is fairly tight
at 1.3” in PA 042 (NE). The PA has been changing rapidly
in recent years – ten years ago it was 090. It was wider
and easier when Hartung observed it, at nearly twice the current
separation. I also found it a fairly easy pair in the 1960s,
visible in a 6” Newtonian at 100x. More recently higher
magnification is needed, and the 7” refractor needed 180x
for a clean separation, though the star was obviously not single
at 100x. The pair is pale yellow and of even brightness. A fine
object.
HJ 5014 (18068-4325). The pair of m5.7 stars
at 1.7” (1999) is just split at 100x; at 180x it’s
a beautiful even yellow pair nicely apart. This has long been
a favourite of mine, helped by the presence of NGC 6541
in the field.
Kappa CrA (18334-3844). At 100x: wide easy
bright white pair in a field lacking other bright stars. In
an 8x50 finder a tiny pair, just split.
HJ 5028 (1812.1-3920) An easy attractive pair,
with the brighter star a fairly close double (BU 759).
The effect is better at 135x, which makes the closer pair easy.
It is at one corner of a triangle (the other stars m8 and 10),
in a pleasantly starry field. The main star is mag. 8.8: the
closer companion m9.2 at 2.0”, the wider companion mag.
9.4 at 14.8” (1991 measures).
COO 227 (18438-3819) 1981 214 29.2 5.13 9.7
A2Vn. This is Lambda CrA: a bright cream-white star has an obvious
wide companion, of dull yellow tone; the field is fairly starry.
BSO 14 (19011-3704) is a bright (mags 6.3,
6,6) well separated (12.8”) even pair, both white; a good
object in a not very starry field. The globular cluster NGC
6723 is NW in a large field; and the nebulae NGC
6726-7-9.
Galaxies?
Not many here, and most of them very, very faint. Try NGC
6768 (1916.5, -4013), an elliptical galaxy with a smaller
fainter companion.
|
MARS ON 27 AUGUST 2003 – WERE YOU THERE?
Karen Brown
It was arranged by the Planetary Sciences
Institute, with participants from the Institute, the Research
Schools of Earth Sciences, and Astronomy and Astrophysics, and
from CAS. The CAS astronomers arrived and set up their telescopes,
and the MSO astronomers, Vince Ford and Heath Jones, and the
other scientists, positioned themselves in the lecture theatre.
Outside, there were 18 scopes ranging in size from Joe Hattley’s
lovely 3” refractor to the wonderful Bobroff 20”,
and they were joined by John Morland’s tripod-mounted
binoculars. The 19 brave men and women, and their band of hardy
assistants prepared to face the hordes. And the hordes came,
not in a clean frontal assault, but from all directions, recklessly
forming cues wherever they encountered a telescope. The Morland
binoculars, strategically positioned between two fairly long
queues, effectively alleviated the frustration of some horde
members waiting in line.
It is estimated that around 4000 members of the public cycled
through the lecture theatre and our small patch of floodlit
space in the grounds of the ANU. Unfortunately, due to security
requirements, all of the lights in Union Square were blazing
on that fateful night, including the ground-level ones, which
only added to the challenge. A couple of our members managed
to wrap the closest lights in some red cellophane, which lessened
the glare a little. Fortunately, Mars was pretty bright, and
the sky was clear. Of course, as the evening progressed, and
Mars climbed higher above the trees, buildings and light haze,
it became easier to see.
There were so many people that the MSO talk was presented
three times, each for an audience of around 850 – there
was no rest for the volunteers, and some didn’t have dinner
until they got home and unpacked after midnight. Those of you
who heard it on the ABC will know that the crowds coming to
the Mars event that night grid-locked Civic for around twenty
minutes.
So, what did we see? In every scope I looked through (all
but the Bobroff, which had a queue of around 200 all night)
the polar cap was clearly visible and, in some, I thought could
vaguely see other features. The visitors were all looking for
the polar caps, having heard about it from others, and were
excited to see it. The quality of image was fairly consistent
among the scopes, and of high quality, light pollution notwithstanding.
However, the viewing public had it firmly in their minds that
the 20” must offer the best view, and it was taking around
two hours to move from the end to the top of that queue. Many
were persuaded to try other scopes, but a couple of people refused
to be turned aside and only ended up seeing one view of Mars
all night! For some reason they had trouble believing that the
view through a 3” (Hattley) or 6” (Kennedy) refractor
would reveal pretty well as satisfying a sight. I can only conjecture
about this – I had a wonderful view through both refractors
and most of the reflectors – the Rawlings C8, Higgins
10” Meade with filters, Nelmes 4”, being notable
inclusions, to name only a few – but did not make it to
the Bobroff ladder. Peter and Judy didn’t get away until
well after midnight, and must have needed about three days sleep
to recover.
It was a marathon effort from all who came along to help.
Neither telescope operators nor scientists had a break, but
the public loved it. It was a great opportunity to promote astronomy,
the Floriade nights, the Society, and to recruit new members.
In fact, all of the membership applications were handed out,
as they were at our last public night in Weston Park, where
we had around 150 visitors. Mars is such a drawcard, so close,
and yet so far; so mysterious yet so like Earth – the
stuff of dreams and fantasies. It was tiring and relentless,
but I wouldn’t have missed it and I’m glad I didn’t.
|
The
new Meade LX200 12inch GPS w UHTC coatings
Shear astronomical brilliance or an unnecessary luxury?
Part 1
Mike Sidonio
At
this years Canberra Astronomical Society (CAS) Annual Dinner
I was approached by Celestron and Starfire disciple and double
star extraordinaire Mr Ross Gould who asked me to do a review
of my now one-year-old telescope, the mysterious Meade LX200
12”GPS. Unfortunately I sense that, at least locally,
there seems to be somewhat of a contemptuous anti-Meade sentiment.
I suspect that this contempt shown for Meade and in fact computerised
GOTO technology in general, is based on tired age-old views
held from the past that are simply not relevant today. I can
remember not really taking CCD imaging seriously a few short
years ago because I was a staunch film astrophotographer. A
few weeks ago I bought my first CCD camera ?
The following, while perhaps colourful at times, is basically
an informal and hopefully an attempt at an unbiased and accurate
assessment of this scope after a highly successful and amazing
year of operation – see, can’t sense any bias can
ya? ?
The LX200GPS range of telescopes is Meade’s latest production
of their flagship Schmidt-Cassegrain line of fully automatic
computerised “GOTO” telescopes. The current line
went on sale, albeit somewhat delayed, in January 2002 to answer
the new Celestron 11-inch GPS Schmidt-Cassegrain that was successfully
released the previous year by Celestron Int. The new Meade line
has also upgraded its highly successful predecessor the LX200
“classic” line of telescopes that was first released
more than 10 years ago.
My new LX200GPS arrived undamaged from Adelaide Optical
Centre on 27 June 2002.
I took the afternoon off work when I got the courier’s
phone call to meet him at my home in Ngunnawal ACT. I was understandably
excited at the prospect of taking possession of such a telescope.
Having read widely about the various options available to me
in my quest to once again own a telescope and having hopefully
dealt with my jealous eagerness to own a telescope that was
at least as good as Michael Nelmes’ wonderful new C14,
I was well and truly ready to lay eyes on this new technological
marvel. Although I had worked extensively with the C14 and 16”
IK6 at the Canberra Observatory, I had not actually owned a
telescope since 1987 when I sold my 8” F7 Newtonian on
a Samson German Equatorial mount circa 1982 to fund the construction
of a still-to-be-completed dream telescope with my still good
friend and astro-buddy Attila Horvath.
Now for the telescope review:
The LX200 12”GPS scope is a Schmidt-Cassegrain
Telescope (SCT) or more precisely a Catadioptric reflector telescope
of the Schmidt-Cassegrain optical design, meaning there is a
combination of a lens or corrector plate as well as mirrors
in the optical train. The front corrector plate has a clear
aperture of 305 mm or 12 inches, and as the subject of many
back and forth tit-for-tat advertising wars between Meade and
Celestron has told us over the years, and for reasons I won’t
go into here, the main mirror is slightly bigger than this.
The effective focal length is 3050 mm giving a focal ratio of
F/10. Notable accessories that come with the scope as standard
are a superbly stable Giant Field Tripod, a useful electronic
Crayford-style micro-focuser, a mirror locking knob and 26 mm
Plossl eyepiece. The mirror locking system allows the notorious
SCT mirror flop, or tendency of the mirror to move when the
scope changes positions, to be effectively eliminated –
a must for CCD imagers and really accurate pointing.
[I would like to take this opportunity to thank
Attila Horvath for, among other things, kindly lending me his
excellent range of late-80’s Televue plusses and complete
range of Meade Super Plusses to use with this scope ?]
The first thing that was evident to me when I
unpacked and assembled the new scope was the size of this beast.
Listed as 73 lbs by Meade, this is the raw weight of the optical
tube assembly (OTA) plus fork arms, which are all one piece.
However once you add some tube balance weights, permanently
attach a Kendrick dew remover control box and heater strips
and perhaps a piggyback camera adapter, you are looking at about
80 lbs or 36 kg, and given its overall size and bulk, your average
pencil-neck astronomer would not consider this scope very portable.
Although, when mounting the scope in the Altitude/Azimuth (Alt/Az)
operational configuration and utilising the integrated carry
handles on the fork arms, it is not too bad, and most able -bodied
men and many women should be capable of setting this beauty
up without too much effort.
The same cannot be said, however, when mounting the scope onto
the optional equatorial Superwedge (available from Meade) when
mounted on the standard issue Giant Field Tripod. In this case
the user is required to lift the scope up high enough and then
to hold on to its 80 lb bulk while guiding a bolt into a slot
on top of the Superwedge. Given my background in truck pulling,
stone lifting and car rolling as a competitive strongman, I
of course don’t have much trouble, but in equatorial mode
this telescope is likely to be beyond the realistic set-up capabilities
of the average person.
Hmm?..Tired of looking at the same old objects
over and over again or frustratingly searching for those elusive
faint galaxies? Then join the GOTO revolution and start observing!
Probably the most significant difference between
this scope and other more traditional amateur telescopes is
its incredibly powerful ability to automatically slew to any
object in the sky with remarkable accuracy no matter how faint
or obscure that object may be. This practice is normally referred
to as doing a “GOTO.”
A GOTO can be done by simply selecting one of the thousands
of objects already in the telescopes database or by entering
the appropriate RA & Dec via the hand control box, it’s
that simple! This attribute is in my opinion the most amazing
ability imaginable in the world of amateur observing and truly
makes observing a pleasure. I still have to pinch myself sometimes
to see if it is real ?
Autostar II
Autostar II is the name given to the latest version of the command
and control software centre or brains of the LX200GPS range
of telescopes. Unlike its predecessor, the LX200 Classic, the
main control CPU’s of the GPS model are located in the
telescope drive base rather than in the handbox, making the
new, easy to use and small lightweight hand box simply a keyboard
to access the scope’s powerful features. Autostar II contains
a plethora of telescope databases, functions and utilities to
improve or alter the performance parameters of the scope. Some
of these features include: the ability to compensate for gear
backlash and worm gear periodic error on both axes, change the
guide rate, set mount upper and lower slew limits and custom
tracking rates as well as fully automatic guided tours of everything
from Messier objects, planetary nebulas and galaxy clusters,
or even the best objects to view for that evening. There is
even a park facility, which when activated at the end of the
evening of viewing, slews the scope to the “home”
position so the next time the scope is fired up and gets a GPS
fix, bingo! it is already aligned and ready to start pointing
to whatever you like. Autostar also contains huge databases
of stars, galaxies, nebulas, constellations, galaxy clusters,
comets, asteroids and even man-made satellites, all of which
are only a button press or two away from viewing! There are
many other functions available but they are too numerous to
mention them all here.
What does the GPS bit stand for?
The main difference between this scope and past GOTO scopes
is the inclusion of the GPS receiver. Essentially the GPS facility
simply allows the scope to find its position on Earth along
with the current time, all by itself, by listening in to and
then locking onto the GPS system of satellites. Using this information
and along with limited user input, the scope is able to align
itself with remarkable accuracy.
Getting it all aligned and pointing accurately
The accuracy of a computerised telescope’s pointing is
an attractive and important quality, and as a result has been
at the heart of competitive advertising between the major manufacturers.
Meade claims that their LX200GPS range of scopes has “…..a
pointing precision of 2 arcmin” while in “High Precision”
mode Meade claims the pointing precision is improved to 1 arcmin
or better. Exactly what “….a pointing precision
of 2 arcmin” actually means seems to me to be a little
unclear however.
[I have noticed that in recent times Meade has
started to add the suffix “(approx)” after referring
to the LX200GPS pointing accuracy but strangely not always…?]
In order to be able to point to anything in the
first place, with any kind of accuracy, the scope must first
be properly aligned. For this, Autostar II provides the user
with several scope alignment modes to choose from including
“Automatic” “Easy” “One Star”
and “Two Star” alignment modes. Only available when
the telescope is set up in Alt/Az mode, the Automatic alignment
sequence is intended for those users who might not have the
required knowledge of the sky necessary for initial alignment,
and it is therefore fully automatic, meaning the scope does
it all by itself. It is also the automatic mode in which the
GPS feature is most useful.
The Meade GPS alignment dance (“….amazing
what technology can do these days huh darlin’ ?”
– Mr & Mrs Average).
After setting up the tripod eyeball level, mounting the scope
and switching it on, the scope via commands from Autostar gets
a GPS fix, and then in an amazing mechanical 60’s disco
dance style, proceeds to find the slew limits of the mount,
magnetic north, then true north and points to three compass
positions where it slews up and down in Dec each time. By doing
this last dance step, Autostar, by using a ball-bearing level
switch in one of the fork arms, is able to establish the tip
and tilt of the mount, to determine how level the scope base
is in order to establish a horizontal frame of reference. Amazingly,
after doing all this, Autostar II now knows – where it
is on Earth, the GPS time, where true north is and how level
the scope is! So armed with all this self-collected data the
scope proceeds to point towards the first alignment star for
final centring! Once the user has centred this star and pressed
enter, Autostar slews the scope to a second alignment star and
asks you to centre this too. Abracadabra! The scope is now aligned
well enough to have every object it is commanded to point at,
finish within the field of almost any eyepiece, all night! Simply
incredible when you think it pretty much did all this by itself!
Apart from inherent mechanical and optical misalign-ments,
the accuracy of the resulting pointing is somewhat dependant
on how accurately you centred the alignment stars, and indeed
can even be affected by the particular pair of alignment stars
chosen by Autostar. So because of this the two star alignment
mode is the one I have found myself using most frequently because
during automatic alignment Autostar can sometimes pick less
than optimal alignment stars that can result in less than perfect
GOTO’s or stars that might be behind a tree or something.
Although the GPS fix is still initiated, “two star”
align-ment however requires the user to first manually position
and level the scope and then choose the two alignment stars
from Autostars extensive data base of alignment stars. The more
accurately you level the scope and the closer you put the scope
to the true “home” position initially, the closer
Autostar will point to the alignment stars. Of course, if you
know which star it is that Autostar wants you to centre, it
doesn’t really matter if it was a bit off, as long as
you centre it, then no problem.
In polar mode the alignment routines are a bit
different. In this mode, pointing to Sigma Octantis and making
wedge adjustments, followed by the centring of an alignment
star chosen by Autostar, is required. Although Autostar II does
an adequate job, in polar mode I have found that the only way
to get really accurate GOTO’s is to take the time to accurately
polar-align the scope. Once accurately polar-aligned it has
been my experience that the pointing accuracy is more consistent
than in Alt/Az mode.
Pointing accuracy
In a nutshell and by my calculations, in polar mode the GOTO
pointing precision of my scope is good enough to land about
2/3 of all objects within about 3 arcmin of field centre!
Well, so what? What exactly does this mean? OK, lets see. If
you insert a standard 10 mm Plossl eyepiece in the scope to
give an effective magnification of over 300X and an actual field
of view of 10 arcmin, then approximately 66% of all objects
you ask the telescope to point to will land within the middle
2/3 of the eyepiece field of view! Not too bad huh? Due mostly
to residual optical and mechanical misalignments, the remaining
1/3 of all-sky GOTO’s will still land the object at least
somewhere within the field of view of the 10 mm Plossl or to
within about 5 arcmin of field centre.
However, if 3 arcmin RMS pointing accuracy is still not good
enough for you, then there is also a “High Precision Pointing”
mode that further improves the pointing accuracy. When this
mode is enabled and you initiate a GOTO, Autostar II automatically
first slews the scope to a relatively bright star near the object
you wish to point at and prompts you to centre it. You centre
this star and press enter and the scope now immediately slews
the couple of degrees or so to the target object, usually landing
it within 1 arcmin of field centre or better! I have found this
feature is particularly useful when I am looking for very faint
objects like galaxies or faint globular clusters, because I
know that after requesting the telescope to point at the desired
object it will be right in the middle of the eyepiece! –
a good starting point in the visual detection process. High
Precision Pointing also allows for the imaging of faint objects
beyond visual limits because you know the object will be right
there smack in the middle of your CCD chip or film frame when
you can’t see it visually, even if the scope has come
from pointing at something on the other side of the sky!
It perhaps puts things in perspective when you think that the
level of pointing accuracy currently available to amateur astronomers
in a moderately-priced production line telescope today was only
possible with custom-built multi-million dollar professional
telescopes as little as a generation ago!
[At the time of writing, Meade will be launching
its new range of LX200GPS scopes with a Smart Mount Technology
or “SMT” package. This package will include, among
other things, a T-Point type software application to allow Autostar
II to further improve scope pointing! ]
Wired to the WWW
One of the major attractions this scope has is the ability to
be able to update the telescope firmware, add new software features
or manipulate the scopes internal databases, all via the Internet.
By simply connecting the scope to a computer via an interface
cable and accessing Meade’s web site, software updates
can be downloaded into the scope, as can updated comet, asteroid
and satellite orbital elements, as well as new guided tours. |
AQUILA
Jenni Kay FRAS
Aquila
is an easy constellation to pick out in the sky, where the
outline of a soaring eagle can be traced by its bright stars.
Within this constellation are some very interesting sights,
but for this session my main targets were planetary nebulae.
While I was satisfied that I could see something of all the
planetaries I searched for, there were a few with amazing
detail as shown on images, and I thought I would really like
to see them again through a larger aperture.
The following observations were made with an 8 f/6 Newtonian,
from my semi rural home site in Lobethal, SA. The skies here
have a limiting naked eye magnitude of 6.1 and the seeing
rated at ANT II-III.
IC 4846 : 19 16.5 09 03 Planetary Nebula
(PN) 80X: Star-like in appearance, similar in brightness to
an 11 mag. field star. Can be detected with full confidence
with an UHC filter and blinking. 120X: Slightly improved
still mostly star-like but with a slightly fuzzy and soft
look to it. In a casual sweep this would probably be overlooked,
mistaken for a star, but in a careful search it can be noticed.
Minkowski 3-34 : 19 27.0 06 35 (PN) 80X:
Some difficulty finding it as it is star like in appearance
and set among 12 mag. field stars. Very good response to the
UHC filter. 120X: Slightly improved has that soft, fuzzy
look to it compared to true stars nearby. Overall size is
5.
NGC 6749 : 19 05.3 01 54 Globular Cluster
(GC) 80X: Suspect there may be an exceedingly small, hazy
spot, but unsure. 120X: Improved view requires care and
averted vision, extremely faint, relatively small, round,
40 in size, with a 13 mag. star near the NE edge. Very difficult!
NGC 6751 : 19 05.9 05 59 (PN) 80X: Very
obvious bright, very small, round, hazy spot, and set in
a fairly rich star field. There is a positive response to
the UHC filter. 120X: Improved bright, small, round, with
soft edges, 25 in size, and equally bright throughout. Central
star not seen.
NGC 6755 : 19 07.8 04 14 Open Star Cluster
(OC) 80X: Obvious enough there is a handful of brighter
11 mag. stars mixed with much fainter. Some of the fainter
resolve where most are lost in an irresolved haze. Near the
centre there is an 11 mag. double star. 120X: Much more interesting
the fainter stars are arranged in small bunches among the
brighter stars. These bunches vary in size and star numbers.
In general, the brightness range is wide from 11 mag. to 13
and fainter. There are fifty stars involved, the cluster has
an overall size of 25.0 and it is not well concentrated.
While this is hardly a typical star cluster, it is certainly
worthy of note. Best view at 120X.
NGC 6756 : 19 08.7 04 42 (OC) Lies 31.0
NE of NGC 6755. 80X: Obvious enough, with
averted vision, as a very soft hazy glow with two stars involved.
120X: Improved view the very faint stars are mostly lost
in irresolved haze, with seven 12-13 mag. stars resolving
well. The cluster has an irregular shape, a size of 5.0,
and is somewhat concentrated.
NGC 6760 : 19 11.2 01 02 (GC) 80X: Very obvious
bright, relatively large, round, soft glow. Lies in an attractive
star field with a handful of bright 9/10 mag. star mixed with
fainter. 120X: Improved view no individual stars resolving,
although near the centre there are 1-2 13 mag. star points.
Overall, the cluster is 1.5 in size, with a brighter core
1.0 in size.
NGC 6772 : 19 14.6 02 42 (PN) 80X: Obvious
enough with care and averted vision relatively faint, large,
round, soft glow. Enhanced view with the UHC filter. 120X:
Much improved relatively faint, round, 1.0 in size, smooth
and even glow throughout. Central star not seen.
NGC 6778 : 19 18.4 01 36 (PN) 80X: Very
obvious relatively bright, very small, almost stellar, equal
to an 11 mag. field star for brightness. Very good response
to the OIII filter. 120X: Much improved bright, small, round,
10 in size. Stands out well in the field wouldnt miss
it!
NGC 6781 : 19 18.5 06 32 (PN) 80X: WOW! Very
obvious relatively bright, large, round, smooth glow from
edge to edge. Very good response to the OIII filter. 120X:
More interesting the glow seems uneven, with the hint of
a darker hole in the centre. Size is 1.5. Now this is one
Id like to see through the 30-inch!
NGC 6790 : 19 22.9 01 31 (PN) 80X: Star-like
only, equal to 10 mag. field star for brightness. The tiny
planetary stands out against the stars with the OIII filter.
120X: Similar view the planetary appears star-like.
NGC 6803 : 19 31.3 10 03 (PN) 80X: Star-like
only. Stands out with the OIII filter. 120X: Star like only.
Equal to 10 mag. star for brightness.
NGC 6804 : 19 31.6 09 13 (PN) 80X: Very obvious
relatively bright, relatively small, round, hazy spot. Positive
response to the OIII filter. 120X: Much improved bright,
round, 40 in size, even glow throughout, now and then I caught
the 14 mag. central star. Lies in an attractive field with
a mix of bright and faint stars.
NGC 6807 : 19 34.5 05 41 (PN) 80X Star-like
only, and equal to 12 mag. star for brightness. Blinking with
the OIII filter picks it out more easily. 120X: Star-like
only.
Sh 2-71 : 19 02.0 02 09 (PN) 80X: Suspected
as a very faint, soft, round, glow. 120X: Improved view with
averted vision very faint, round, 40 in size. Too weak
for the UHC filter. Overall, it appears as a soft, dim, smooth
glow. Heres another Id like to see through the 30-inch! |
©2003 Canberra Astronomical Society
Inc.
Email Webmaster
Last updated: 2006-06-27
Click here,
or on the CAS Logo at the top of the page
to return to the CAS Home Page |
|